Schema for Drosophila Chain/Net - Drosophila Genomes, Chain and Net Alignments
  Database: DeugGB2    Primary Table: chainDm6    Row Count: 20,478   Data last updated: 2022-10-20
fieldexampleSQL type info
bin 585smallint(5) unsigned range
score 19569double range
tName AFPQ02000001varchar(255) values
tSize 1356int(10) unsigned range
tStart 2int(10) unsigned range
tEnd 334int(10) unsigned range
qName chr3Rvarchar(255) values
qSize 32079331int(10) unsigned range
qStrand -char(1) values
qStart 25394835int(10) unsigned range
qEnd 25395162int(10) unsigned range
id 7059int(10) unsigned range

Sample Rows
 
binscoretNametSizetStarttEndqNameqSizeqStrandqStartqEndid
58519569AFPQ0200000113562334chr3R32079331-25394835253951627059
58551155AFPQ02000004104701047chr3R32079331-25406256254074441980
58515057AFPQ020000051025350945chr3L28110227-617679061772919630
58533898AFPQ020000061030120886chr3L28110227-624002462406873610
58527832AFPQ02000007113231131chr3R32079331-862737986280774634
58513004AFPQ02000008704120696chr3R32079331-141800131418064211275
58550466AFPQ02000009105601056chr3R32079331-14209466142103582034
58539447AFPQ0200001012261611193chr3R32079331+891797689187882944
58560233AFPQ02000014113261123chr3R32079331+24986428249875311509
58528639AFPQ020000151022181016chr3R32079331+24985769249866664477

Note: all start coordinates in our database are 0-based, not 1-based. See explanation here.

Drosophila Chain/Net (drosophilaChainNet) Track Description
 

Description

Genomic scaffolds from each Drosophila species are aligned against the D. eugracilis genome assembly (DeugGB2) using LAST with default parameters. The alignments are then processed using the UCSC whole genome alignment protocol (i.e. chaining and netting).

References

Chain/Net

Kent WJ, Baertsch R, Hinrichs A, Miller W, and Haussler D. Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100(20): 11484-11489.

LAST

Kielbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):487-93.