Schema for Drosophila Chain/Net - Drosophila Genomes, Chain and Net Alignments
  Database: DrhoGB2    Primary Table: chainDm6    Row Count: 44,349   Data last updated: 2022-10-20
fieldexampleSQL type info
bin 585smallint(5) unsigned range
score 30336double range
tName AFPP02000002varchar(255) values
tSize 1228int(10) unsigned range
tStart 12int(10) unsigned range
tEnd 1212int(10) unsigned range
qName chr3Rvarchar(255) values
qSize 32079331int(10) unsigned range
qStrand +char(1) values
qStart 24177676int(10) unsigned range
qEnd 24178546int(10) unsigned range
id 13889int(10) unsigned range

Sample Rows
 
binscoretNametSizetStarttEndqNameqSizeqStrandqStartqEndid
58530336AFPP020000021228121212chr3R32079331+241776762417854613889
5857799AFPP020000031579690799386chr3R32079331+223738412237414843011
58539339AFPP02000009110201083chr3L28110227+5199909520085110587
58546002AFPP020000101326261326chr3R32079331-154506615461688661
58570125AFPP02000011106051059chr3L28110227+520701152085475134
58543031AFPP02000012106521065chr3L28110227-22900486229012999467
58542054AFPP0200001310040993chr3R32079331-154843215492299753
58571159AFPP0200001414803981477chr3L28110227-22893462228945225061
58555003AFPP02000015114101141chr3L28110227+522128552223426718
585106567AFPP020000162403782403chr3L28110227+325745632594693542

Note: all start coordinates in our database are 0-based, not 1-based. See explanation here.

Drosophila Chain/Net (drosophilaChainNet) Track Description
 

Description

Genomic scaffolds from each Drosophila species are aligned against the D. rhopaloa genome assembly (DrhoGB2) using LAST with default parameters. The alignments are then processed using the UCSC whole genome alignment protocol (i.e. chaining and netting).

References

Chain/Net

Kent WJ, Baertsch R, Hinrichs A, Miller W, and Haussler D. Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100(20): 11484-11489.

LAST

Kielbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):487-93.