Schema for Drosophila Chain/Net - Drosophila Genomes, Chain and Net Alignments
  Database: dm6    Primary Table: chainDgriImproved    Row Count: 19,570   Data last updated: 2022-10-21
fieldexampleSQL type info
bin 585smallint(5) unsigned range
score 25288double range
tName chr2Lvarchar(255) values
tSize 23513712int(10) unsigned range
tStart 8664int(10) unsigned range
tEnd 9283int(10) unsigned range
qName scaffold_15203varchar(255) values
qSize 11997470int(10) unsigned range
qStrand +char(1) values
qStart 2038632int(10) unsigned range
qEnd 2039245int(10) unsigned range
id 5819int(10) unsigned range

Sample Rows
 
binscoretNametSizetStarttEndqNameqSizeqStrandqStartqEndid
58525288chr2L2351371286649283scaffold_1520311997470+203863220392455819
58512837chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_1497372184+508055124611590
58511714chr2L2351371288169225scaffold_903413762-133391374812533
58513378chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_2771513-719116011128
58513042chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_69353535-2346278711414
58512920chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_91377527-815125611511
58512837chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_301810593+6857729811589
58513173chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_125641341-749119011293
58512966chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_1497372184+1435187611471
58513051chr2L2351371288169257scaffold_69995057-3861430211404

Note: all start coordinates in our database are 0-based, not 1-based. See explanation here.

Drosophila Chain/Net (drosophilaChainNet) Track Description
 

Description

Genomic scaffolds from each Drosophila species are aligned against the D. melanogaster genome assembly (dm6) using LAST with default parameters. The alignments are then processed using the UCSC whole genome alignment protocol (i.e. chaining and netting).

References

Chain/Net

Kent WJ, Baertsch R, Hinrichs A, Miller W, and Haussler D. Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100(20): 11484-11489.

LAST

Kielbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):487-93.